Work Zone Mobility and Safety Program
Photo collage: temporary lane closure, road marking installation, cone with mounted warning light, and drum separated work zones.
Office of Operations 21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technologies

Work Zone Traffic Management

Managing traffic during construction is necessary to minimize traffic delays, maintain or improve motorist and worker safety, complete roadwork in a timely manner, and maintain access for businesses and residents. Work zone traffic management strategies should be identified based on the project constraints, construction phasing/staging plan, type of work zone, and anticipated work zone impacts. Once these strategies are implemented, they need to be consistently monitored to ensure they are effective in managing work zone impacts. Examples of possible performance measures for monitoring work zone traffic management strategies include volume, travel time, queue length, delay, number of incidents, incident response and clearance times, contractor incidents, community complaints, user costs, and cumulative impacts from adjacent construction activities.

One resource for work zone traffic management strategies is Developing and Implementing Transportation Management Plans for Work Zones (HTML, PDF 1.4 MB). This document provides information about developing and implementing Transportation Management Plans (TMPs), including information on how and where a TMP fits into project delivery processes and procedures, a list of possible components for a TMP, descriptions of work zone management strategies, and examples and practices of how agencies are currently using TMPs. Other traffic management resources are described below.

Incident Management in Work Zones

  • Guidebook on Incident Management Planning in Work Zones, Published 2005 (PDF 2MB) - This guidebook is a resource for engineers and construction managers who are interested in developing sound incident management plans for work zones.
  • Guidelines for Developing Traffic Incident Management Plans for Work Zones (PDF 1.6MB) - This Colorado DOT (CDOT) report discusses best practices, existing CDOT traffic incident management (TIM) programs, and considerations and key components for developing and implementing TIM programs for work zones.
  • T-REX Incident Response Manual (PDF 787KB) - This manual provided guidance and information to assist in responding to incidents in the T-REX project area. The T-REX project involved reconstruction of Denver's I-25/I-225 Southeast Corridor.
  • Work Zone Traffic and Incident Management System - Keeping Traffic Moving During Reconstruction of the Big I, a Major Interstate-Interstate Interchange in Albuquerque (HTML, PDF 127KB) - This case study describes how ITS was used during the Big I project to minimize capacity restrictions due to incidents by more quickly identifying incidents and determining an appropriate and effective response to clear the roadway.
  • Simplified Guide to the Incident Command System for Transportation Professionals (HTML, PDF 2.2MB) - This guide introduces the Incident Command System and its organization and operations to stakeholders who may be called upon to provide expertise, assistance, or material during highway incidents.

Congestion Mitigation

Work Zone Traffic Control and Management Guidance

Work Zone Traffic Management Examples

  • "Holding Down the Fort", by Frank Cippel, article in December 2007 issue of Roads & Bridges, Volume: 45 Number: 12. In 2002, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) began a major reconstruction project on the I-279 Fort Pitt Bridge and Tunnel in the city of Pittsburgh. With heavy traffic using the bridge and tunnel, closing the structures and detouring motorists would not be easy. PennDOT began studying how to best complete the work and planning detour routes in the early 1980s, well before the project began. PennDOT decided to perform various stages of the project separately in an effort to minimize the impact a total closure would have on the region. The last phase of the project involved work on the main bridge span and the tunnel. Closing of the main span of the bridge and the tunnel required the use of two main detour routes that already carried large volumes of traffic. With this in mind, PennDOT began reconstruction and rehabilitation work on the detour routes almost 10 years before the closures occurred. During the closures, PennDOT implemented many innovative strategies to reduce congestion and delay on the detour routes, including turning off traffic signals to create free-flow routes, expanding lane reversal hours, and opening a hole through an existing concrete barrier to prevent motorists from having to merge into a single lane when exiting a tunnel.

Additional Resources

Download the free adobe acrobat reader to view PDFs You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the PDFs on this page.

Office of Operations