Office of Operations Freight Management and Operations

The FAF as a Policy and Systems Analysis Tool

Slide 1: The FAF as a Policy and Systems Analysis Tool

Bruce Lambert
Office of Freight Management and Operations
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration

Logo of U.S. Department of Transportation

Images of a truck, a row of freight containers, a ship, and an airplane

Slide 2: The Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) – Basic Objectives


  • Understand magnitude and geography of freight moving on the nation's transportation system
  • Develop tool to evaluate emerging congestion and capacity challenges related to freight
  • Support reauthorization policy analysis
  • Involved:
    • Synthesis of diverse data (BTS, Army Corps, Reebie Truck, Rail Waybill Sample, etc.)
    • Working across the modes.
    • Understanding emerging logistics and trade/transportation issues

Slide 3: Freight by Mode, Moving within the U.S., 1998 – (15 Billion Tons, $9 Trillion)

Bar graph of freight by mode within the U.S. in 1998. Domestic trucking is shown at 10 billion tons and $6 trillion, domestic rail at 2 billion tons and $1 trillion, domestic water at 1 billion tons and less than $1 trillion, domestic air at less than 1 billion tons and almost $1 trillion, and international total at almost 2 billion tons and $1 trillion.

Speaker Notes:

National summary of freight by tons and value moved by each of the modes for 1998.

This is only domestic movements, and international shipments represent another 10% of total U.S. freight activity.

Truck is the largest mode in the United States, as this figure includes not only the intercity movements, but also the local and regional activities. The other modes, while important, are dominated by truck volumes, especially in the local or shorter regional markets.

For the other modes, rail and water handle bulk products, which are quite heavy, but generally less expensive on a per ton basis.

Air shipments, while carrying small total tonnages compared to the other modes, do carry higher valued products.

Slide 4: Truck, Rail and Water Segments of 1 Million Tons or More (1998)

Map of Truck, Rail and Water Segments

Image Details

Slide 5: Freight Analysis Framework FAF Truck Flow (1998)

Map of FAF Truck Flow, 1998

Image Details

Slide 6: Total Traffic Forecasts (domestic and international) by Tons – 1998, 2010, 2020

Bar graph of total traffic forecasts (domestic and international) by tons for 1998, 2010, and 2020.

Image Details

Slide 7: Growth in VMT by Vehicle Type on the FAF Network, 1998 to 2020


empty cell VMT CAGR
1998 2010 2020 98 - 10 98 - 20
Passenger Car VMT 1,164,215 1,490,267 1,728,586 2.1% 1.8%
Non-FAF Truck VMT 80,703 125,906 164,159 3.8% 3.3%
FAF-Truck VMT 81,125 124,119 163,881 3.6% 3.2%
All Truck VMT 161,827 250,025 328,041 3.7% 3.3%
All Vehicle VMT 1,326,042 1,740,291 2,056,627 2.3% 2.0%

Slide 8: Estimated Congestion on the NHS in 2020

Map of the U.S. National Highway System in 2020. Growth in traffic will result in additional congestion on the nation's highways. In 2020, most of the nation's urban roads will either approach or exceed capacity, and rural Interstate segments that link major urban markets will also experience higher vehicle volumes.

Slide 9: Estimates of Freight Movements in the NASTO Region (FAF Database tonnage and values)


Empty Cell Tons
(millions)
Value
(billions $)
1998 2020 %Change 1998 2020 %Change
By Mode
Air 5 14 184% 282 1,204 327%
Highway 3,188 5,659 78% 2,448 7,694 214%
Other 469 658 40% 60 123 106%
Rail 839 1,365 63% 235 647 176%
Water 306 442 45% 46 120 162%
Grand Total 4,807 8,138 69% 3,070 9,788 219%
By Destination/Market
Domestic 3,990 6,665 67% 2,593 7,918 205%
International 817 1,473 80% 478 1,869 291%
Grand Total 4,807 8,138 69% 3,070 9,788 219%

Slide 10: Estimates of Freight Movements in the NASTO Region (FAF Database tonnage and values)


Tons (millions) 1998 2020
Nonmetallic Minerals 884 1,056
Crude Petroleum or Natural Gas 423 543
Coal 407 540
Farm Products 400 564
Petroleum or Coal Products 390 550
Value (billions)
Transportation Equipment 440 1,033
Chemicals or Allied Products 367 1,013
Secondary Traffic 352 1,475
Food or Kindred Products 308 1,156
Machinery 202 846

Slide 11: Massachusetts: Total Combined Truck Flows (1998)

Map of Massachusetts total combined truck flows, 1998.

Image Details

Slide 12: Pennsylvania Total Rail Flows (1999)

U.S. map showing freight network flows by rail in all 48 contiguous states, with more than 5 million tons for the year shown on rail networks within Pennsylvania and between Pennsylvania and Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois.

Slide 13: Estimated Total Trucks Volumes – NY Region, 1998

Map of New York and surrounding area showing average annual daily truck traffic in 1998, with the heaviest traffic in urban areas and along Interstate corridors, especially I-90 and I-95.

Slide 14: Estimated Total Trucks Volumes – NY Region, 2020

Map of New York and surrounding area showing projected average annual daily truck traffic in 2020, with the heaviest traffic in urban areas and along Interstate corridors, as in 1998, especially I-81, I-87, I-90, and I-95. This projection does not consider the addition of new capacity or improvements to the existing infrastructure.

Slide 15: I-10 Corridor Analysis in 2000 (Source: Wilber Smith)

Map of I-10 Corridor Analysis, 2000.

Image Details

Slide 16: Colorado V/C Ratio Distribution 2020

Map of Colorado showing the volume to capacity ratio distribution for 2020. Most roads are shown below capacity, but those in the center of the state are shown as approaching capacity and those near Denver and Colorado Springs are shown as exceeding capacity.

Slide 17: Items Released this Fall


  • Data release
    • Commodity Database
    • Highway Capacity Database
  • Maps of freight activity for nation, states, selected metro areas and gateways
  • State Freight Profiles
    • Still developing more items…

Slide 18: FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations, USDOT

http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight

Bruce Lambert
Project Manger
202-366-4241

Office of Operations