Office of Operations Freight Management and Operations

FAF2 FREIGHT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Prepared by:


Maks Alam, P.Eng.
Principal Investigator and Author

Dr. Edward Fekpe, P.Eng.
Contributing Author

Mohammed Majed
Researcher

Battelle

Submitted to:

Office of Freight Management and Operations (HOFM)
Federal Highway Administration
Washington, D.C.

June 27, 2007


Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1:  INTRODUCTION

1.1  Background

1.2  Objectives of FAF2 Project

1.3  Objectives of FAF2 Freight Traffic Analysis

1.4  Overview of the Methodology

1.5  Organization of the Report

CHAPTER 2:  FAF2 FREIGHT NETWORK DEVELOPMENT

2.1  Introduction

2.2  NHPN Version 2005.10 – The Source Network

2.3  Linking HPMS Data to the FAF2 Highway Network

2.3.1  Update FAF2 LRS Schema with HPMS LRS Data Schema

2.3.2  Load HPMS Traffic and Roadway Performance Data

2.3.3  Spreading HPMS Section Data to the FAF2 Network Link

2.3.4  Assigning Data for Non-HPMS FAF2 Network Links

2.3.5  Quality Assurance Analysis

2.4  Summary of Freight Network Development

CHAPTER 3:  DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK PAYLOAD EQUIVALENCY
FACTOR

3.1  Introduction

3.2  Tonnage to Truck Payload Conversion Process

3.2.1  Truck Configuration

3.2.2  Commodity to Truck Body Type Allocation

3.2.3  Payload Estimation and Validation

3.2.4 ; Tons-to-Truck Trips Conversion

3.3  Empty Truck Percent Estimation

CHAPTER 4:  FAF2 TRUCK O-D DATA DISAGGREGATION

4.1  Introduction

4.2  FAF2 O-D Data Disaggregation Process

4.2.1 & Develop Allocate FAF2 Freight Tonnage O-D to Vehicle Classes

4.2.2  Develop and Generate Freight Trip Activity Centers

4.2.3  Disaggregate FAF2 O-D Truck Trips to Freight Activity Centers

CHAPTER 5:  FREIGHT TRUCK ASSIGNMENT AND CALIBRATION

5.1  Introduction

5.2  Network Preparation

5.2.1  Impedance Function

5.2.2  Free Flow Travel Speed

5.2.3  Travel Impedance

5.2.4  Link Capacity

5.3  Assignment Algorithm and Calibration

5.3.1  Assignment Algorithm

5.3.2  Freight Assignment Calibration

CHAPTER 6:  CAPACITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

6.1  Introduction

6.2  Capacity Analysis

6.2.1  Traffic Volume

6.2.2  Design Hour Volume

6.2.3  Capacity

6.2.4  V/C Ratios

6.2.5  Travel Time, Speed and Delay

6.3  Highway Capacity Impacts

6.4  Highway Impact on Truck Traffic

CHAPTER 7:  CONCLUSIONS

List of Tables

Table 2.1:  Relationship Between HPMS LRS Milepost and NHPN Node

Table 2.2:  HPMS Data Elements Used in the Study

Table 2.3:  FAF2 Network Missing Data Lookup Tables

 

Table 3.1:  Results of Vehicle Weight Validation

Table 3.2:  Results of Variation Analysis

Table 3.3:  Truck Equivalent Factors Used in FAF2 Tonnage to Truck

Table 3.4:  Summary of Percent Empty Trucks

 

Table 4.1:  Tonnage Allocation Distribution Matrix by Distance

Table 4.2:  CFS Zone to CFIPS FAZ Disaggregated Freight Share

Table 4.3:  CFIPS FAZ to FAF Network Freight Activity Node Disaggregated Freight Share

 

Table 5.1:  Speed Limits (mph) for Missing HPMS Speed Data

Table 5.2:  Results of Calibration  

 

Table 6.1:  J Value for Multilane, Freeway, and Rural FAF Highway Links

Table 6.2:  J values for Urban FAF Highway Links

Table 6.3:  Summary Statistics of Capacity Analysis

Table 6.4:  Miles of Highway by Truck Volume Groups

List of Figures

Figure 1.1:  Building Blocks of FAF2 Freight Traffic Analysis

 

Figure 2.1:  HPMS Data Chain or Network Topological Direction

Figure 2.2:  Network Flow Direction “One-Way” Pairs

Figure 2.3:  Alaska Highway Connection to Mainland USA via Canada

Figure 2.4:  Data Capture Procedure

Figure 2.5:  Aggregation of Traffic Data

Figure 2.6:  HPMS 2002 Truck Volume on FAF2 Network

 

Figure 3.1:  Steps in Conversion Process

Figure 3.2:  Selected Major Body Types

Figure 3.3:  Configurations of Vehicle Groups and Samples of Body Types

Figure 3.4:  VIUS and VTRIS Mean Weight Comparison

Figure 3.5:  Cumulative Distribution of Percent of Miles Empty

Figure 3.6:  Percent of Miles Empty by Body Type

 

Figure 4.1:  FAF2 Ton to Truck Data Conversion Process

Figure 4.2:  FAF2 Disaggregated Freight Activity Centers used for Assignment

Figure 4.3:  Overall Disaggregation Process

 

Figure 5.1:  Comparison of AON and SUE Truck Traffic Assignment

Figure 5.2:  HPMS 2002 Truck Flow on FAF2 Highway Network

Figure 5.3:  Base Year 2002 FAF2 Truck Flow on FAF2 Highway Network

Figure 5.4:  Year 2035 FAF2 Truck Flow on FAF2 Highway Network

 

Figure 6.1:  NHS Highway Network Congestion for Year 2002

Figure 6.2:  NHS Highway Network Congestion for Year 2035

Figure 6.3:  NHS Highway Miles Exceeding Capacity

Figure 6.4:  Percentage of NHS Highway Miles Exceeding Capacity

Figure 6.5:  NHS interstate Highway Miles by Capacity Categories

Figure 6.6:  NHS Miles of Roadway by Truck Traffic (AADTT) Groups

Figure 6.7:  Interstate Miles of Roadway by Truck Traffic (AADTT) Groups

Figure 6.8:  NHS Non-Interstate Miles of Roadway by Truck Traffic (AADTT) Groups

 

 

previous | next

Office of Operations